 |
A ChemtrailsGeelong.com Article |
Tip: visitors to this site and other sites of the authentic internet truth movement have reported difficulty with page loading for both internal and external links. (It's not too difficult to surmise the reason.) If this occurs try disconnecting from the internet and immediately re-connecting. Then try the link again.
"Let us beware of illusions: As long as people in the West believe in the six million and the gas chambers, they will always support Israel in principle, even if they criticise the Israeli treatment of the Palestinians as being unnecessarily harsh."
"If the holocaust were publicly exposed as a shameless fraud, if people all over the world learned that, while the Jews undoubtedly were ..... persecuted during the Second World War, there was no attempt to exterminate them, that the death factories, gas chambers and gas vans were a Jewish swindle, and that the six million figure was a fantastic exaggeration, the Zionist-led "New World Order" would be all but finished."
- Jurgen Graf, Historical revisionist-in-exile, 'Holocaust Revisionism and its Political Consequences', 2000
Travesty at Nuremberg
Do the war crimes trials prove the Holocaust narrative? Consider the following quotations from Nuremberg-contemporary authorities and other sources:
“The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence.... The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof.......”
- From the Charter of the International Military Tribunal (a.k.a the Nuremburg Farce)
 |
| US Chief Justice Wennerstrum |
"The victor in any war is not the best judge of war crime guilt."
"The initial war crimes trial was judged and prosecuted by Americans, Russians, British and French with, much of the time, effort and expenses devoted to whitewashing the Allies and placing the sole blame for WW2 upon Germany. What I have said of the nationalist character of the tribunals applies to the prosecution. The high ideals announced as the motives for creating these tribunals has not been evident. The prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from vindictiveness, aloof from personal ambitions for convictions. It has failed to strive to lay down precedents which might help the world to avoid future wars. The entire atmosphere here is unwholesome. Linguists were needed. The Americans are notably poor linguists. Lawyers, clerks, interpreters and researchers were employed who became Americans only in recent years, whose backgrounds were embedded in Europe's hatreds and prejudices."
- US Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles F. Wennerstrum, Judge at Nuremburg
"You know how I have despised anti-Semitism. You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge - you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish. Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial - for their own sake. For - mark this well - the charge 'a war for the Jews' is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and again. The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here will be cited as proof of this charge. Sometimes it seems that the Jews will never learn about these things. They seem intent on bringing new difficulties down on their own heads. I do not like to write about this matter - it is distasteful to me - but I am disturbed about it. They are pushing and crowding and competing with each other and with everyone else."
- Thomas Dodd, Leading Prosecutor at the Nuremburg Trials
"I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamour of the time. The concept of ex post facto is not congenial to the Anglo-American viewpoint on law."
- US Associate Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, Nuremberg contemporary
"The Nuremberg Trials have made the waging of an unsuccessful war a crime."
- Field Marshal Bernard L. Montgomery, 1948
"... a fantastic desecration of the ideals of Western Civilisation, and appalling miscarriage of justice... a misuse of evidence for vicious ends, all of which will someday be exposed as a shocking travesty of high legal and moral principles."
- Professor Henry M. Adams, Ph.D
“About this whole judgment there is the spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice. The hanging of the 11 men convicted will be a blot on the American record which we shall long regret.”
- US Senator Robert Taft, 1946
"Chief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg......I hate to see the pretence that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas."
- US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone
"He that is without sin, let him cast the first stone........"
"For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you......
- Lord Jesus Christ, John 8:7 & Matthew 7:2
Click here for Anthony Lawson's 'Holocaust Hate Speech and Were the Germans so Stupid? — Updated' (Or if that link is banned by the thought police in your neck of the woods try here instead. Or here.)*
Click here for 'The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust. Do the 'war crimes' trials prove extermination?' by Mark Weber
For much more from highly credible contemporary sources regarding the Nuremberg farce, click here. (French language site, but scroll down page for English citations.)
*Note: the present author finds Lawson's somewhat routine comparison of Adolf Hitler with the other political leaders mentioned from minutes 16:55 to 17:40 in the video to be an unfair one. And the omission (from said company) of despicable war criminals Roosevelt, Churchill, Truman and Eisenhower (of Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Rhine-Meadows infamy to name a few - Stalin, George W. Bush and Tony Blair made the cut) is also, in my opinion regrettable, in an otherwise excellent, insightful and not-routine video.
No body. No murder weapon.
In the conclusion of the Anthony Lawson video linked above two highly pertinent questions are raised about the Nuremburg trials:
1. Was the evidence given by leading American forensic pathologist at the time, Dr. Charles Larson, that not one case of death by poison gas was found, overlooked or deliberately suppressed?
2. Was the evidence given by US War Department lawyer and investigator, Stephen F. Pinter, that there were no human gas chambers in any of the German camps, overlooked or deliberately suppressed?
Revisionist historian, Theodore O'Keefe elaborates further on evidence, provided by early on-the-spot US Army investigators such as Larson and Pinter and clearly suppressed at Nuremburg, in his excellent article, 'The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies'. Here is an excerpt from the concluding summary of that article:
"The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth about the wartime German concentration camps have since been corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:
1. The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2. Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp commanders and guards.
3. On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German policy and German orders.
4. The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and the other camps captured by the Soviets." [For the full article click here.]
For an excellent radio interview/discussion with Ted O'Keefe and Mark Weber of the Institute of Historical Review click here. Or you can listen to it here below - click play.*
- Thomas Dodd, Leading Prosecutor at the Nuremburg Trials
"I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamour of the time. The concept of ex post facto is not congenial to the Anglo-American viewpoint on law."
- US Associate Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, Nuremberg contemporary
"The Nuremberg Trials have made the waging of an unsuccessful war a crime."
- Field Marshal Bernard L. Montgomery, 1948
"... a fantastic desecration of the ideals of Western Civilisation, and appalling miscarriage of justice... a misuse of evidence for vicious ends, all of which will someday be exposed as a shocking travesty of high legal and moral principles."
- Professor Henry M. Adams, Ph.D
“About this whole judgment there is the spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice. The hanging of the 11 men convicted will be a blot on the American record which we shall long regret.”
- US Senator Robert Taft, 1946
"Chief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg......I hate to see the pretence that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas."
- US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone
"He that is without sin, let him cast the first stone........"
"For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you......
- Lord Jesus Christ, John 8:7 & Matthew 7:2
Click here for Anthony Lawson's 'Holocaust Hate Speech and Were the Germans so Stupid? — Updated' (Or if that link is banned by the thought police in your neck of the woods try here instead. Or here.)*
Click here for 'The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust. Do the 'war crimes' trials prove extermination?' by Mark Weber
For much more from highly credible contemporary sources regarding the Nuremberg farce, click here. (French language site, but scroll down page for English citations.)
*Note: the present author finds Lawson's somewhat routine comparison of Adolf Hitler with the other political leaders mentioned from minutes 16:55 to 17:40 in the video to be an unfair one. And the omission (from said company) of despicable war criminals Roosevelt, Churchill, Truman and Eisenhower (of Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Rhine-Meadows infamy to name a few - Stalin, George W. Bush and Tony Blair made the cut) is also, in my opinion regrettable, in an otherwise excellent, insightful and not-routine video.
No body. No murder weapon.
In the conclusion of the Anthony Lawson video linked above two highly pertinent questions are raised about the Nuremburg trials:
1. Was the evidence given by leading American forensic pathologist at the time, Dr. Charles Larson, that not one case of death by poison gas was found, overlooked or deliberately suppressed?
2. Was the evidence given by US War Department lawyer and investigator, Stephen F. Pinter, that there were no human gas chambers in any of the German camps, overlooked or deliberately suppressed?
Revisionist historian, Theodore O'Keefe elaborates further on evidence, provided by early on-the-spot US Army investigators such as Larson and Pinter and clearly suppressed at Nuremburg, in his excellent article, 'The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies'. Here is an excerpt from the concluding summary of that article:
"The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth about the wartime German concentration camps have since been corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:
1. The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2. Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp commanders and guards.
3. On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German policy and German orders.
4. The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and the other camps captured by the Soviets." [For the full article click here.]
For an excellent radio interview/discussion with Ted O'Keefe and Mark Weber of the Institute of Historical Review click here. Or you can listen to it here below - click play.*
*Note: This is Weber in his pre-compromise days. The career liars at the Simon Wiesenthal Centre declined the invitation/opportunity to openly debate and try to refute the facts presented by the IHR pair in this radio broadcast to over a million listeners in the US in 1990. The real reason for the Wiesenthal Centre's policy of no-show, notwithstanding their lame excuses, is a chronic incapacity for anything but spin and rhetoric.
What about Eyewitness testimony?
Actually, eyewitness testimony is not very reliable - a fact recognized by scholars and courts of law, as well as people of common sense, world-wide. In the hierarchy of evidence, so to speak, physical and documentary evidence always takes precedence over eyewitness testimony in a law court or in scholarly work, for obvious reasons; while the former is objective in nature, the subjective nature of the latter and the imperfection of the human memory on which it depends, makes it far more open to manipulation and distortion. And this tendency increases over time, not to mention with the presence of duress or incentive to see things in a particular way, both of which feature heavily when considering Holocaust testimonies.
It really is a testimony to the effectiveness of post war propaganda that so few people in the war-time "Allied" countries, Australia included, realize the practical non-existence of material or documentary evidence in support of essential narrative Holocaust allegations, while at the same time, so many harbour the deep impression that witnesses to alleged Holocaust crimes are far more numerous and far more credible than they really are. In fact, material and documentary evidence largely contradicts so-called 'eyewitness' Holocaust testimony, and many of the testimonies themselves are also contradictory (not to mention downright implausible or impossible) even from the same 'witness' reporting the same event on different occasions.For readers who would like to investigate this further Jurgen Graf's highly readable and highly instructive article "Eye Witness Testimony of Homicidal Gassings in German Concentration Camps During World War II" is an excellent place to start. And Manfred Kohler's in depth treatment of the subject in "The Value of Testimony and Confessions Concerning the Holocaust"* is also a must-read.
The reader may also find the work of documentary film-maker Eric Hunt* interesting, both regarding reliability of Holocaust witnesses, as well as the role of Hollywood and the mass media in Holocaust myth-making. Below are links to four of his films (the latter two his latest), but there are others. Warning! Not for children. Viewers discretion advised. Some of the images in Eric Hunt's documentaries may be disturbing to some viewers, including adults.
What about Eyewitness testimony?
Actually, eyewitness testimony is not very reliable - a fact recognized by scholars and courts of law, as well as people of common sense, world-wide. In the hierarchy of evidence, so to speak, physical and documentary evidence always takes precedence over eyewitness testimony in a law court or in scholarly work, for obvious reasons; while the former is objective in nature, the subjective nature of the latter and the imperfection of the human memory on which it depends, makes it far more open to manipulation and distortion. And this tendency increases over time, not to mention with the presence of duress or incentive to see things in a particular way, both of which feature heavily when considering Holocaust testimonies.
It really is a testimony to the effectiveness of post war propaganda that so few people in the war-time "Allied" countries, Australia included, realize the practical non-existence of material or documentary evidence in support of essential narrative Holocaust allegations, while at the same time, so many harbour the deep impression that witnesses to alleged Holocaust crimes are far more numerous and far more credible than they really are. In fact, material and documentary evidence largely contradicts so-called 'eyewitness' Holocaust testimony, and many of the testimonies themselves are also contradictory (not to mention downright implausible or impossible) even from the same 'witness' reporting the same event on different occasions.For readers who would like to investigate this further Jurgen Graf's highly readable and highly instructive article "Eye Witness Testimony of Homicidal Gassings in German Concentration Camps During World War II" is an excellent place to start. And Manfred Kohler's in depth treatment of the subject in "The Value of Testimony and Confessions Concerning the Holocaust"* is also a must-read.
The reader may also find the work of documentary film-maker Eric Hunt* interesting, both regarding reliability of Holocaust witnesses, as well as the role of Hollywood and the mass media in Holocaust myth-making. Below are links to four of his films (the latter two his latest), but there are others. Warning! Not for children. Viewers discretion advised. Some of the images in Eric Hunt's documentaries may be disturbing to some viewers, including adults.
Spielberg's Hoax - The Last Days of the Big Lie (Alternative links here and here)
The Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax
(Alternative links here and here)
*New* - Questioning the Holocaust - *New* (Alternative links here, here and with German subtitles, here. Note that though this film is sometimes referred to as part 1 of 2, the latter part was never in fact completed by Hunt and does not exist. In any case part 1 is nonetheless a complete film in and of itself.)
The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth (Alternative links here and in HD, here)
Update February 2024: Film maker Eric Hunt has, we hear, now disavowed his former excellent work including the documentaries linked to above, for reasons best known to himself - we do not speculate .... Nevertheless, as mentioned numerous times elsewhere on this website, the message is more important than the messenger, especially when it is the truth, and readers are invited to see for themselves if the documentaries listed above are in fact as pertinent as they ever were. In short, facts are facts, no matter the caprice of those who deliver them.
*Please note that I personally do not find the comparison both Hunt and Kohler make of the Holocaust trials and those of the medieval inquisition to be an exact one for a number of reasons I will not go into here.
*Please note that I personally do not find the comparison both Hunt and Kohler make of the Holocaust trials and those of the medieval inquisition to be an exact one for a number of reasons I will not go into here.
Emotional manipulation by Hollywood and TV, or the real facts? Which do you prefer gentlemen?
Mass media propaganda is enormously powerful. It is a mistake to think we are above its influence if we have not turned it off altogether – the methods are so subtle and so psychologically insidious. Photographs or video can be shown out of context or sometimes so as to completely misrepresent what they actually depict. Pictures that depict the brutality, harshness and horror of war have a traumatising effect on our minds that render them vulnerable to manipulation and misdirection. Spin doctors and propagandists know this only too well. Cinema constructs scenarios that have never taken place in unscripted reality. And all this can be done with such expert manipulation of our emotions (the use of music is particularly powerful for example), that even a person in full possession of the facts of a matter can find himself being swayed in spite of them.
Consider the photo above. Do you really believe you know what it represents of reality? Actually that which we believe about the published images we see depends largely on the text that accompanies them and also on our own deep-rooted assumptions about things, our conjectures and our preconceived ideas. And these preconceived notions, to speak honestly, come to us largely from the mass media, and perhaps also from the so-called 'education' system. Now click the photo above for an explanation of it, this time based upon the facts.......
Mass media propaganda is enormously powerful. It is a mistake to think we are above its influence if we have not turned it off altogether – the methods are so subtle and so psychologically insidious. Photographs or video can be shown out of context or sometimes so as to completely misrepresent what they actually depict. Pictures that depict the brutality, harshness and horror of war have a traumatising effect on our minds that render them vulnerable to manipulation and misdirection. Spin doctors and propagandists know this only too well. Cinema constructs scenarios that have never taken place in unscripted reality. And all this can be done with such expert manipulation of our emotions (the use of music is particularly powerful for example), that even a person in full possession of the facts of a matter can find himself being swayed in spite of them.
Consider the photo above. Do you really believe you know what it represents of reality? Actually that which we believe about the published images we see depends largely on the text that accompanies them and also on our own deep-rooted assumptions about things, our conjectures and our preconceived ideas. And these preconceived notions, to speak honestly, come to us largely from the mass media, and perhaps also from the so-called 'education' system. Now click the photo above for an explanation of it, this time based upon the facts.......
Consider the following quotations from Professor Norman Finkelstein, well-known Jewish-American political scientist and author of “The Holocaust Industry”. Keep in mind that Professor Finkelstein's parents were prisoners at Auschwitz and Majdanek and both survived the war:
"The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind."
- 'The Holocaust Industry' p.138
"Much of the literature on Hitler's Final Solution is worthless as scholarship. Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense if not sheer fraud."
- ibid pg. 28
"Given the nonsense that is turned out daily by the Holocaust industry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics."
- ibid pg. 32
“One of my father's lifelong friends was a former inmate with him in Auschwitz, a seemingly incorruptible left-wing idealist who on principle refused German compensation after the war. Eventually he became a director of the Israeli Holocaust museum, Yad Vashem. Reluctantly and with genuine disappointment, my father finally admitted that even this man had been corrupted by the Holocaust industry, tailoring his beliefs for power and profit. As the rendering of the Holocaust assumed ever more absurd forms, my mother liked to quote (with intentional irony) Henry Ford: 'History is bunk.' ”
- ibid pg. 5
"Once ideologically recast, The Holocaust.......proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel."
- ibid pg. 18
“The Holocaust has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon. Through its deployment, one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a 'victim' state, and the most successful ethnic group in the United States has likewise acquired victim status. Considerable dividends accrue from this specious victimhood — in particular, immunity to criticism, however justified. Those enjoying this immunity, I might add, have not escaped the moral corruptions that typically attend it."
- ibid pg. 3
"The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind."
- 'The Holocaust Industry' p.138
"Much of the literature on Hitler's Final Solution is worthless as scholarship. Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense if not sheer fraud."
- ibid pg. 28
"Given the nonsense that is turned out daily by the Holocaust industry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics."
- ibid pg. 32
“One of my father's lifelong friends was a former inmate with him in Auschwitz, a seemingly incorruptible left-wing idealist who on principle refused German compensation after the war. Eventually he became a director of the Israeli Holocaust museum, Yad Vashem. Reluctantly and with genuine disappointment, my father finally admitted that even this man had been corrupted by the Holocaust industry, tailoring his beliefs for power and profit. As the rendering of the Holocaust assumed ever more absurd forms, my mother liked to quote (with intentional irony) Henry Ford: 'History is bunk.' ”
- ibid pg. 5
"Once ideologically recast, The Holocaust.......proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel."
- ibid pg. 18
“The Holocaust has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon. Through its deployment, one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a 'victim' state, and the most successful ethnic group in the United States has likewise acquired victim status. Considerable dividends accrue from this specious victimhood — in particular, immunity to criticism, however justified. Those enjoying this immunity, I might add, have not escaped the moral corruptions that typically attend it."
- ibid pg. 3
Professor Robert Faurisson
When History comes to you enforced by law, only one thing is certain - it is a lie.
It is a disturbing fact that in a world where it is permissible to question just about anything, including the existence of God, the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, the wisdom of holy scripture and commandments, and even the validity of time honoured and wholesome life-serving institutions such as Family and Marriage, it is no less than illegal in many countries to question the official Holocaust narrative even on perfectly reasonable and logical grounds. And if it is not exactly illegal then it is frowned upon and punished in other less overt ways. So why the foregoing of otherwise (apparently) cherished western principles of free speech and freedom of thought on this one issue to the exclusion of all others, we ask? Think about it. Is it Truth that needs protection by the law from intelligent investigation, or a Lie? You decide.
“In the Western world, people have the right to challenge all religions, except the religion of the Holocaust . One may make fun of God, Jesus, Mohamed but not of what Simon Wiesenthal, Elie Wiesel and Simone Veil have had to say about the alleged genocide or the alleged gas chambers.”
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people (but not their leaders!) and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
“I assert, in fact, that these famous alleged homicidal "gas chambers" are nothing but a tall story of wartime.”
"Whoever allows himself to claim that the alleged Nazi gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews are a historical reality is, whether he likes it or not, giving support to a horrid lie that has become the number one war propaganda weapon of the State of Israel, a colonialist, racist and imperialist State. Let whoever has the nerve to support the Holocaust myth look at his hands! His hands are red with the blood of Palestinian children!"
- Professor Dr. Robert Faurisson, French essayist and historical revisionist
It is a disturbing fact that in a world where it is permissible to question just about anything, including the existence of God, the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, the wisdom of holy scripture and commandments, and even the validity of time honoured and wholesome life-serving institutions such as Family and Marriage, it is no less than illegal in many countries to question the official Holocaust narrative even on perfectly reasonable and logical grounds. And if it is not exactly illegal then it is frowned upon and punished in other less overt ways. So why the foregoing of otherwise (apparently) cherished western principles of free speech and freedom of thought on this one issue to the exclusion of all others, we ask? Think about it. Is it Truth that needs protection by the law from intelligent investigation, or a Lie? You decide.
“In the Western world, people have the right to challenge all religions, except the religion of the Holocaust . One may make fun of God, Jesus, Mohamed but not of what Simon Wiesenthal, Elie Wiesel and Simone Veil have had to say about the alleged genocide or the alleged gas chambers.”
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people (but not their leaders!) and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
“I assert, in fact, that these famous alleged homicidal "gas chambers" are nothing but a tall story of wartime.”
"Whoever allows himself to claim that the alleged Nazi gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews are a historical reality is, whether he likes it or not, giving support to a horrid lie that has become the number one war propaganda weapon of the State of Israel, a colonialist, racist and imperialist State. Let whoever has the nerve to support the Holocaust myth look at his hands! His hands are red with the blood of Palestinian children!"
- Professor Dr. Robert Faurisson, French essayist and historical revisionist
Get the facts. Click here for one of Robert Faurisson's definitive interviews, this one with "Storia Illustrata" in 1979, The Gas Chambers: Fact or Myth?
Robert Faurisson's interview with Jim Rizoli 2015
Robert Faurisson - A Most Honourable Man (Anthony Lawson's Tribute.)
The Ever-Falling Auschwitz Death Estimates
Robert Faurisson's interview with Jim Rizoli 2015
Robert Faurisson - A Most Honourable Man (Anthony Lawson's Tribute.)
The Ever-Falling Auschwitz Death Estimates
From 4 to 1.5 million and falling. Above, left: Pre 1989 and right: Post 1989. Official deaths estimate plaques at Auschwitz are quietly, but drastically reduced in 1989 due to the release by the USSR of captured death registry volumes making previous mythology untenable. It's been twenty seven years since then, but I've never heard of any subsequent and appropriate adjustment to the 'six million' mythology, have you?
One of the more recent estimates (2002) from mainstream Holocaust exterminationists of the Auschwitz death toll comes from 'Der Spiegel' editor Fritjof Meyer. In an article for the German 'Osteuropa' magazine journal he gives the figure of "510,000 dead, of which probably 356,000 were murdered in the gas". Of course, a careful analysis of the article in question reveals the usual lack of any real evidence, even for this newly reduced figure, not to mention the alleged use of 'gas'. On the other hand the International Tracing Service of the Red Cross, and the above mentioned death registries released by the Soviet Union in 1989 (for the crucial period between July 29, 1941 and December 31, 1943) give estimates of about 135,000 and 70,000 respectively, of which the Soviet captured records indicate about 40% were Jewish. Most of the deaths recorded are from natural causes such as old age, disease (typhus mostly) and malnutrition, the latter two being notably prevalent after supply lines were cut to the camp by Allied aerial bombing in the final months of the war. For a brief run down of the ever-falling Auschwitz death estimates over the years click here. For the article "A Factual Appraisal Of The 'Holocaust' By The Red Cross" click here.
Dresden et al: the real holocaust
holocaust /ˈhɒləkɔːst/ destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire or nuclear war
"The 'democrats', who claim to have 'liberated' the German people from Hitler, brought nothing but terror and destruction. In Dresden, they murdered several hundreds of thousands people in one single hellish night and destroyed countless cultural treasures. Women who were giving birth to children in the delivery rooms of the burning hospitals jumped out of the windows, but within minutes, these mothers and their children, who were still hanging at the umbilical cords, were reduced to ashes too. Thousands of people whom the incendiary bombs had transformed into living torches jumped into the ponds, but phosphorus continues to burn even in the water. Even the animals from the zoo, elephants, lions and others, desperately headed for the water, together with the humans. But all of them, the new-born child, the mother, the old man, the wounded soldier and the innocent animal from the zoo and the stable, horribly perished in the name of 'liberation'."
- Thomas Brookes, 'Dresden 13 February 1945, A Real Holocaust'
Left: Dresden, 1945 - the culmination of what the politically neutral Red Cross described as "the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies". Literally countless civilians, including many of the hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing from the Soviet hordes in the East, and known by the Allies to be in the city at the time, were burned to death in one night of fire-bombing, that included the hideous white phosphorus incendiary bombs favoured by Israel in more recent times, in illegal attacks on helpless Palestinian civilians. To put this in proper perspective, consider that the number of men, women and children that were sadistically murdered largely on one night of the three day bombing attack on Dresden (there was no reasonable military objective for this psychopathic exercise) is, according to reasonable, conservative estimates (and not the absurd propaganda figures concocted by mainstream information channels) almost certainly in the order of magnitude of the entire number of Jews that died in all of the Reich territory concentration camps combined, during the entire period of the Third Reich, mostly from unsought for disease and malnutrition. It was also almost certainly greater than the number that perished on the days atom bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. In fact, the utterly craven British and American attack on Dresden, against which there was little or no return fire, left at least as many civilians dead (if not twice as many, or more) as Britain suffered during the entire war. Keep in mind that Dresden was only one of many German cities whose civilians were deliberately targeted and murdered in this way when the war in Europe was already over for all intents and purposes. Now ask yourself: what was the real holocaust of World War II? And were stories of atrocities of at least equal magnitude, that is, the phoney 'Jewish gas chamber' narrative, invented and disseminated as an attempt to justify the unjustifiable, both in the guilt-stricken minds of those perpetrators who had managed to retain a conscience of sorts, and in the minds of the misguided public at large?
The world's foremost expert on the bombing of Dresden, British historian David Irving, succinctly discusses the real Dresden death toll figure here.
For an article by Finnish statistician, Carl Nordling, on "the most reliable investigation done in the entire post-war period" on the number of Jewish deaths in German concentration camps during WWII, click here.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive!"
- Walter Scott
The following excerpt from a June 1944 secret memo of the British Ministry of Information to high-level civil servants, leading media figures and the higher British Clergy sheds extraordinary light on how public thought leaders are clandestinely conscripted by government into shaping public opinion on propaganda lines. (The same protocol is, of course, active today.) Note that only anticipated Soviet atrocities are referred to - the Ministry could hardly make explicit reference to equally anticipated British and American atrocities (such as Dresden) in a memo to all too often gullible public thought leaders who were, if not exactly well meaning, at least disposed to think of themselves as such.
"The only alternative to denial [of anticipated Bolshevik atrocities] is to distract public attention from the whole subject. Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the "Corpse Factory" and the "Mutilated Belgian Babies" and the "Crucified Canadians [i.e. World War I propaganda lies]." Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans......which have and which will be put into circulation by the Ministry. Your expression of belief in such may convince others."
- H.Hewett, Assistant Secretary for the British Ministry of Information, June 1944
"Atrocity propaganda is how we won the war. And we're only really beginning with it now! We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will escalate it until nobody will accept even a good word from the Germans, until all the sympathy they may still have abroad will have been destroyed, and they themselves will be so confused that they will no longer know what they are doing. Once that has been achieved, once they begin to run down their own country and their own people, not reluctantly but with eagerness to please the victors, only then will our victory be complete. It will never be final. Re-education needs careful tending, like an English lawn. Even one moment of negligence, and the weeds crop up again - those indestructible weeds of historical truth."
- Sefton Delmer, British chief propagandist to expert on international law Prof. Grimm, after the German surrender, 1945
"We made a monster, a devil out of Hitler. Therefore we couldn’t disavow it after the war. After all, we mobilized the masses against the devil himself. So we were forced to play our part in this diabolic scenario after the war. In no way we could have pointed out to our people that the war was only an economic preventive measure."
- James Baker, former US foreign minister speaking to Der Spiegel, 1992
Consider also the following commentary from two high profile British political/military figures of the WWII period:
"The devastation of Dresden in February, 1945, was one of those crimes against humanity whose authors would have been arraigned at Nuremberg if that court had not been perverted."
- Rt. Hon. Richard. H.S. Crossman, MP, British Labour Government Minister
"Adolf Hitler only undertook the bombing of British civilian targets reluctantly after the RAF had commenced bombing German civilian targets... Hitler would have been willing at any time to stop the slaughter. Hitler was genuinely anxious to reach with Britain an agreement confining the action of aircraft to battle zones."
- J.M.Spaight CBE, Principle Assistant Secretary of the British Air Ministry
Churchill's culpability for setting the hideous precedent in 1940 of targeting civilians in the war with Germany is, of course, conceded by orthodox historians of the Second Word War. For example:
"It may be Inconvenient History but England rather than Germany initiated the murderous slaughter of bombing civilians thus bringing about retaliation. Chamberlain conceded that it was "absolutely contrary to International law." It began in 1940 and Churchill believed it held the secret of victory. He was convinced that raids of sufficient intensity could destroy Germany's morale, and so his War Cabinet planned a campaign that abandoned the accepted practice of attacking the enemy's armed forces and, instead made civilians the primary target. Night after night, RAF bombers in ever increasing numbers struck throughout Germany, usually at working class housing, because it was more densely packed.'
- From 'The Peoples' War' by Angus Calder, 1969
Educate yourself! For more on Dresden and other unpunished Allied war crimes click here, here and here.
One of the more recent estimates (2002) from mainstream Holocaust exterminationists of the Auschwitz death toll comes from 'Der Spiegel' editor Fritjof Meyer. In an article for the German 'Osteuropa' magazine journal he gives the figure of "510,000 dead, of which probably 356,000 were murdered in the gas". Of course, a careful analysis of the article in question reveals the usual lack of any real evidence, even for this newly reduced figure, not to mention the alleged use of 'gas'. On the other hand the International Tracing Service of the Red Cross, and the above mentioned death registries released by the Soviet Union in 1989 (for the crucial period between July 29, 1941 and December 31, 1943) give estimates of about 135,000 and 70,000 respectively, of which the Soviet captured records indicate about 40% were Jewish. Most of the deaths recorded are from natural causes such as old age, disease (typhus mostly) and malnutrition, the latter two being notably prevalent after supply lines were cut to the camp by Allied aerial bombing in the final months of the war. For a brief run down of the ever-falling Auschwitz death estimates over the years click here. For the article "A Factual Appraisal Of The 'Holocaust' By The Red Cross" click here.
Dresden et al: the real holocaust
holocaust /ˈhɒləkɔːst/ destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire or nuclear war
"The 'democrats', who claim to have 'liberated' the German people from Hitler, brought nothing but terror and destruction. In Dresden, they murdered several hundreds of thousands people in one single hellish night and destroyed countless cultural treasures. Women who were giving birth to children in the delivery rooms of the burning hospitals jumped out of the windows, but within minutes, these mothers and their children, who were still hanging at the umbilical cords, were reduced to ashes too. Thousands of people whom the incendiary bombs had transformed into living torches jumped into the ponds, but phosphorus continues to burn even in the water. Even the animals from the zoo, elephants, lions and others, desperately headed for the water, together with the humans. But all of them, the new-born child, the mother, the old man, the wounded soldier and the innocent animal from the zoo and the stable, horribly perished in the name of 'liberation'."
- Thomas Brookes, 'Dresden 13 February 1945, A Real Holocaust'
Left: Dresden, 1945 - the culmination of what the politically neutral Red Cross described as "the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies". Literally countless civilians, including many of the hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing from the Soviet hordes in the East, and known by the Allies to be in the city at the time, were burned to death in one night of fire-bombing, that included the hideous white phosphorus incendiary bombs favoured by Israel in more recent times, in illegal attacks on helpless Palestinian civilians. To put this in proper perspective, consider that the number of men, women and children that were sadistically murdered largely on one night of the three day bombing attack on Dresden (there was no reasonable military objective for this psychopathic exercise) is, according to reasonable, conservative estimates (and not the absurd propaganda figures concocted by mainstream information channels) almost certainly in the order of magnitude of the entire number of Jews that died in all of the Reich territory concentration camps combined, during the entire period of the Third Reich, mostly from unsought for disease and malnutrition. It was also almost certainly greater than the number that perished on the days atom bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. In fact, the utterly craven British and American attack on Dresden, against which there was little or no return fire, left at least as many civilians dead (if not twice as many, or more) as Britain suffered during the entire war. Keep in mind that Dresden was only one of many German cities whose civilians were deliberately targeted and murdered in this way when the war in Europe was already over for all intents and purposes. Now ask yourself: what was the real holocaust of World War II? And were stories of atrocities of at least equal magnitude, that is, the phoney 'Jewish gas chamber' narrative, invented and disseminated as an attempt to justify the unjustifiable, both in the guilt-stricken minds of those perpetrators who had managed to retain a conscience of sorts, and in the minds of the misguided public at large?
The world's foremost expert on the bombing of Dresden, British historian David Irving, succinctly discusses the real Dresden death toll figure here.
For an article by Finnish statistician, Carl Nordling, on "the most reliable investigation done in the entire post-war period" on the number of Jewish deaths in German concentration camps during WWII, click here.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive!"
- Walter Scott
The following excerpt from a June 1944 secret memo of the British Ministry of Information to high-level civil servants, leading media figures and the higher British Clergy sheds extraordinary light on how public thought leaders are clandestinely conscripted by government into shaping public opinion on propaganda lines. (The same protocol is, of course, active today.) Note that only anticipated Soviet atrocities are referred to - the Ministry could hardly make explicit reference to equally anticipated British and American atrocities (such as Dresden) in a memo to all too often gullible public thought leaders who were, if not exactly well meaning, at least disposed to think of themselves as such.
"The only alternative to denial [of anticipated Bolshevik atrocities] is to distract public attention from the whole subject. Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the "Corpse Factory" and the "Mutilated Belgian Babies" and the "Crucified Canadians [i.e. World War I propaganda lies]." Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans......which have and which will be put into circulation by the Ministry. Your expression of belief in such may convince others."
- H.Hewett, Assistant Secretary for the British Ministry of Information, June 1944
"Atrocity propaganda is how we won the war. And we're only really beginning with it now! We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will escalate it until nobody will accept even a good word from the Germans, until all the sympathy they may still have abroad will have been destroyed, and they themselves will be so confused that they will no longer know what they are doing. Once that has been achieved, once they begin to run down their own country and their own people, not reluctantly but with eagerness to please the victors, only then will our victory be complete. It will never be final. Re-education needs careful tending, like an English lawn. Even one moment of negligence, and the weeds crop up again - those indestructible weeds of historical truth."
- Sefton Delmer, British chief propagandist to expert on international law Prof. Grimm, after the German surrender, 1945
"We made a monster, a devil out of Hitler. Therefore we couldn’t disavow it after the war. After all, we mobilized the masses against the devil himself. So we were forced to play our part in this diabolic scenario after the war. In no way we could have pointed out to our people that the war was only an economic preventive measure."
- James Baker, former US foreign minister speaking to Der Spiegel, 1992
Consider also the following commentary from two high profile British political/military figures of the WWII period:
"The devastation of Dresden in February, 1945, was one of those crimes against humanity whose authors would have been arraigned at Nuremberg if that court had not been perverted."
- Rt. Hon. Richard. H.S. Crossman, MP, British Labour Government Minister
"Adolf Hitler only undertook the bombing of British civilian targets reluctantly after the RAF had commenced bombing German civilian targets... Hitler would have been willing at any time to stop the slaughter. Hitler was genuinely anxious to reach with Britain an agreement confining the action of aircraft to battle zones."
- J.M.Spaight CBE, Principle Assistant Secretary of the British Air Ministry
Churchill's culpability for setting the hideous precedent in 1940 of targeting civilians in the war with Germany is, of course, conceded by orthodox historians of the Second Word War. For example:
"It may be Inconvenient History but England rather than Germany initiated the murderous slaughter of bombing civilians thus bringing about retaliation. Chamberlain conceded that it was "absolutely contrary to International law." It began in 1940 and Churchill believed it held the secret of victory. He was convinced that raids of sufficient intensity could destroy Germany's morale, and so his War Cabinet planned a campaign that abandoned the accepted practice of attacking the enemy's armed forces and, instead made civilians the primary target. Night after night, RAF bombers in ever increasing numbers struck throughout Germany, usually at working class housing, because it was more densely packed.'
- From 'The Peoples' War' by Angus Calder, 1969
Educate yourself! For more on Dresden and other unpunished Allied war crimes click here, here and here.
British historian David Irving
Click here for an eye-opening and inspired lecture given by British historian David Irving in which he discusses who was financing/controlling Winston Churchill behind the scenes during World War II. After being bankrupted by the American stock exchange crash of 1937/1938 Churchill's political affiliations and 'convictions' more or less entered the marketplace and he began to receive substantial financial support from various organizations with very defined political objectives. These included a secret Zionist pressure group called 'The Focus' organized by the Board of Jewish Deputies in England, a wealthy Austro-Jewish Banker emerging from 'the woodwork of the City of London', and even the Czech government no less. Unlike the so-called 'historians' of mindless orthodoxy, Irving uses first hand investigative methods and original documents to paint a picture of Churchill as phoney, bungler and traitor-to-his-people ('that drunken bum' as Roosevelt was apt to call him) far different from the official propaganda image. (There is also an excellent article on the lecture by Ted O'Keefe of the IHR here.)
Click here* for the short clip 'David Irving - The Sinking of the Battleship Auschwitz'* in which Irving arrives at the inescapable conclusion that Auschwitz, like the much smaller scale and shorter-lived 'Hitler Diaries' hoax he was instrumental in exposing, is a fraud. It is regrettable that years of relentless persecution instigated by Jewish pressure groups, including prison, immense fines, deportation, interference with ability to work and earn, and all the usual slanders and libels, have reduced this great historian to some compromise (like Weber of the IHR) regarding the ongoing Holocaust fraud. Nonetheless Irving has done much, at his own expense and to his extreme (temporal, apparent) disadvantage to advance the cause of freedom of speech and to highlight and teach the unmatchable rewards inherent in doing one's own work properly, with honesty and integrity, rather than mindless conformity.
(*Unfortunately this video has now been removed by the Youtube thought police and we have been unable to locate it elsewhere. Ed.)
For another interesting lecture (transcript) by David Irving on the skulduggery employed by Churchill, Roosevelt and the British secret service to bring the unwilling American public into the war, just like the unwilling British public before them, click here. (Includes discussion of evidence of the Allied leaders' foreknowledge of the Pearl Harbour 'surprise' attacks.)
"We managed to drag the United States into the First World War and if they [Britain] do what we demand in regards to Palestine and the Jewish armed forces, then we can get the Jews in the USA to drag the United States into this one too."
- Chaim Weizmann, Zionist, President of the World Jewish Congress and later President of Israel, September 1941
Update January 2017: Hollywood Jewry in damage control
In what appears to be international Jewry's panic stations attempt to halt the increasing number of people waking up to the Holocaust fraud, Hollywood has come up with its latest insult to the collective intelligence: a film called 'Denial', allegedly about the Irving/Lipstadt Holocaust libel trial of early 2000, but unlikely to have even a passing resemblance to the reality of that unfortunate event, in which exceptional WW2 historian David Irving, entirely on his own and with his own funds, took on a huge legal team costing millions of dollars and funded by Jewish tycoons and organizations, among them Steven Spielberg and the American Jewish Committee.......
Read More
The real reason for World War II
Simply, Germany under Hitler had become a dangerous example on the international stage, of an alternative, largely independent and highly effective system of national politics and economics.
"Therefore we will not establish our economic policy to suit the conceptions or desires of bankers in New York or London. Germany's economic policy is conducted exclusively in accordance with the interests of the German people. In this respect I am a fanatical socialist, one who has ever in mind the interests of all his people. I am not the slave of a few international banking syndicates. I am under no obligation to any capitalist group. I sprang from the German people. My Movement, our Movement, is a German people's Movement, and it is only to this German people that we are obligated."
- Adolf Hitler, Munich 24 February 1941
"Germany's unforgivable crime before the second world war was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit."
- Winston Churchill to Lord Robert Boothby 1960
"Not the political doctrine of Hitler has hurled us into this war. The reason was the success of his increase in building a new economy. The roots of war were envy, greed and fear."
- Major General J.F.C. Fuller, British military historian
Simply, Germany under Hitler had become a dangerous example on the international stage, of an alternative, largely independent and highly effective system of national politics and economics.
"Therefore we will not establish our economic policy to suit the conceptions or desires of bankers in New York or London. Germany's economic policy is conducted exclusively in accordance with the interests of the German people. In this respect I am a fanatical socialist, one who has ever in mind the interests of all his people. I am not the slave of a few international banking syndicates. I am under no obligation to any capitalist group. I sprang from the German people. My Movement, our Movement, is a German people's Movement, and it is only to this German people that we are obligated."
- Adolf Hitler, Munich 24 February 1941
"Germany's unforgivable crime before the second world war was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit."
- Winston Churchill to Lord Robert Boothby 1960
"Not the political doctrine of Hitler has hurled us into this war. The reason was the success of his increase in building a new economy. The roots of war were envy, greed and fear."
- Major General J.F.C. Fuller, British military historian
"The genie is out of the bottle. And I'm absolutely convinced, although for the moment we are in a very tricky, dangerous situation, that we have already passed the age of repression."
- The inimitable Ernst Zundel, civil rights activist and author, 1998
Notable revisionists - suggested reading and viewing.
Below are some links to essential reading and viewing for those new to the subject of historical revisionism, and in particular those who never even knew there was another side to the Holocaust story – you may be in for something of a shock as to what the physical and documentary evidence actually indicates. In any case, if you value the truth, you need only resolve to do your best to ignore the almost ubiquitous antics of the Zionist propaganda and libel machine (Google, Wikipedia etc...) that surrounds all politically incorrect views on the Holocaust subject, and let clear thinking and reason do the rest.
Here is a rule of thumb: if what you are reading resorts simply to calling people names while endowing its own views with dismissive, quasi-religious qualities that allow it to conveniently evade the need for evidential verification, such as 'self-evident', 'obvious', or 'common knowledge' and so on, then you are probably dealing with a fraud......
Suggested further reading
Robert Faurisson: essential quotations.
The Faurisson Archive. (Available in both French and English - simply choose English when prompted for translation or right click on page and scroll down for English translation option.)
The Gas Chambers: Fact or Myth? (Faurisson interview with 'Storia Illustrata'.)
'The Victories of Revisionism' by Professor Faurisson
holocausthandbooks.com (A huge collection of books and documentaries on the holocaust by revisionists worldwide.)
codoh.com (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust) Click here for the website's 'What we do and what we believe page.'
'The Hoax of the Twentieth Century' by Professor Arthur Butz in pdf. Seminal book on the Holocaust hoax first published in 1976.
'The Leuchter Report' by Fred Leuchter. Myth-busting report on the alleged execution gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, Poland by eminent execution equipment expert, based on on-site investigations and analysis.
'The Rudolf Report' by Germar Rudolf. Another expert report, this one from chemist Germar Rudolf, based on his 'scholarly impeccable' onsite analysis of chemical and technical aspects of the alleged "gas chambers" at Auschwitz. Surely the final nail in the coffin of the Auschwitz fraud.
Jurgen Graf: 'Holocaust Revisionism and its Political Consequences'
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."
- Article 19, United Nations Declaration of Human Rights
"To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
- Voltaire
Doug Christie, Barrister, 1946-2013
Gallery of martyrs. From left to right: Ernst Zundel, Professor Dr. Robert Faurisson, Ursula Haverbeck, Sylvia Stolz, Dr. Frederick Toben and Germar Rudolf. With the exception of Prof. Faurisson, all have spent time in jail or are still there simply for having a politically incorrect opinion and saying so. Ernst Zundel has been particularly targeted with a relentless and vindictive persecution that has included a total of seven years in prison, his house being burned down by an offshoot group of the notorious terrorist group, the Jewish Defamation league (JDL), and his being effectively kidnapped in the US, and barred from re-entering both the country of his wife (the US) and his own country of many decades, Canada, on completely spurious grounds, by completely corrupt immigration officials in both Canada and the US. He is now forced to reside in Germany where, no doubt, his every move continues to be zealously monitored by his vile and cowardly detractors. Prof. Faurisson has been fined heavily and viciously attacked physically on ten separate occasions – the last time by a terrorist group calling itself 'The Sons of the Memory of the Jews'. Grandmother Ursula Haverbeck was sentenced by a German court in November 2015 to ten months in prison, after German thought police raided and ransacked her home along with the homes of three of her supporters. Civil rights lawyer Sylvia Stolz has spent three and a half years in prison already for speaking her admirable mind in the circus arena that passes for a courtroom in her homeland, and has recently been given a further twenty months for speaking at a conference with far too much dignity, grace and intelligence for the liking of occupied-Germany's utterly craven and lackey political and judicial system. Australian Frederick Toben has spent a year in prisons both in Germany and Australia again simply for asking perfectly reasonable questions about the Holocaust. Germar Rudolf is living now in exile in the US with his wife and child after serving a long prison sentence in Germany for the unpardonable thought-crime of applying science and logic to Holocaust myths. Not pictured above but also a martyr of free speech is Horst Mahler, yet another German lawyer, and author, sentenced to twelve years and eleven months in prison in February 2009 for what amounts to thought crimes against organized Jewry's current occupation of his German homeland's justice and political system. Please note that these brave men and women are just the tip of the iceberg – the list is far too long to mention here in its entirety.
Doug Christie - Freedom of Speech is the Issue
Canadian defence lawyer Doug Christie spent much of his life defending the freedom of speech and thought of politically incorrect individuals with powerful enemies. Sadly he passed away in March 2013. At his funeral, Order of Canada winner Fr. Lucien Larre proclaimed him a saint for fighting "for what was right." "No matter the threats to his life", said Fr. Larre, "or the number of times his office windows were broken. He stood tall."
Below are some quotations from the "Battling Barrister".
"History has not been made by great masses of people instantly coming to a realization of the truth. History has always depended on a few courageous individuals who stood against the tide of ignorance in History, who dared to stand for their principles and fight for them, and who did not and would not surrender to what they knew to be wrong."
“We have clear knowledge that if we don't do this we only get weaker, we only will get weaker tomorrow. This tyranny is growing. It's not diminishing. It is not something that is going to go away. There is no easy solution. There is no quick fix. We got this way over a long period of time being apathetic, indifferent and contemptuous of other people's problems saying I'm alright, to hell with you. You probably deserve to get all that bad press because you opened your mouth, right? That's what we say about most people who get in trouble. And it's so easy to do. And that process of looking after me too, what's that? Do you know what that is? That's isolation. And that's the first step to alienation and criminalisation. Cause if they can do that to you, they can do that to your neighbour, and gradually we all sit in fear in our homes waiting for our pension cheque wondering if someone's watching, whether we got more money than the last guy and whether Grant Bristow's next cousin is listening to our telephone. We live in terror.” [October 1997]
“I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something; and because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do something that I can do.”
- Doug Christie, Advocate of Freedom
Suggested Viewing
Actually, there is a wealth of viewing on the subject of Holocaust revisionism to keep anyone who delights in truth (or as Prof. Faurisson prefers to put it, 'exactitude') over propaganda interested for days on end. The list that follows is but a small portion of that store, but may serve well as an introduction for those relatively new to the subject.
Off Your Knees, Germany! Ernst Zundel 1983 - 2003 (Full Video)
Robert Faurisson Documentary
Doug Christie YouTube Channel
Doug Christie: Thoughts on the Release of Ernst Zundel 2010
Doug Christie Free Speech is the Issue. Speech from Oct 16 1997 in Toronto
Short selected clips from the Douglas Christie Memorial Video Archive
David Cole: Jewish documentary maker exposes the fraud of Auschwitz
Bishop Richard Williamson on the Holocaust – 2008 (English Bishop Williamson, so far courageous and resolute, despite persecution from both within and without the Catholic church...)
The Truth about Holocaust by Jewish Professor Domergue
Sylvia Stolz "The Reality of Freedom of Expression" Full Speech, Uncut (English voice-over version. This link will take you to a page that includes a transcript of the subtitle version. Note that the video is also known as "Speech Ban - Prohibition of Proof - Defence Prohibition, Sylvia Stolz")
Sylvia Stolz 2013 "A Personal Reply" w. English Subtitles (This link will take you to a page that includes a transcript of the subtitles. Note that this video is also known as "Sylvia Stolz - Reply to Holocaust Denial accusations")
Ursula Haverbeck: The Panorama Interview, with English Subtitles Alternative link here. The first link is to the video, but requires login to archive.org to view. The second doesn't require login. The first, however, includes a well-written article introducing the video.
Ursula Haverbeck on The Greatest Problem of Our Time (with English Subtitles)
The Great Holocaust Trial 1985 (FULL VIDEO)
The Revisionists - men & women of heart and soul (Tribute clip)
Doug Christie - Freedom of Speech is the Issue
Canadian defence lawyer Doug Christie spent much of his life defending the freedom of speech and thought of politically incorrect individuals with powerful enemies. Sadly he passed away in March 2013. At his funeral, Order of Canada winner Fr. Lucien Larre proclaimed him a saint for fighting "for what was right." "No matter the threats to his life", said Fr. Larre, "or the number of times his office windows were broken. He stood tall."
Below are some quotations from the "Battling Barrister".
"History has not been made by great masses of people instantly coming to a realization of the truth. History has always depended on a few courageous individuals who stood against the tide of ignorance in History, who dared to stand for their principles and fight for them, and who did not and would not surrender to what they knew to be wrong."
“We have clear knowledge that if we don't do this we only get weaker, we only will get weaker tomorrow. This tyranny is growing. It's not diminishing. It is not something that is going to go away. There is no easy solution. There is no quick fix. We got this way over a long period of time being apathetic, indifferent and contemptuous of other people's problems saying I'm alright, to hell with you. You probably deserve to get all that bad press because you opened your mouth, right? That's what we say about most people who get in trouble. And it's so easy to do. And that process of looking after me too, what's that? Do you know what that is? That's isolation. And that's the first step to alienation and criminalisation. Cause if they can do that to you, they can do that to your neighbour, and gradually we all sit in fear in our homes waiting for our pension cheque wondering if someone's watching, whether we got more money than the last guy and whether Grant Bristow's next cousin is listening to our telephone. We live in terror.” [October 1997]
“I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something; and because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do something that I can do.”
- Doug Christie, Advocate of Freedom
Suggested Viewing
Actually, there is a wealth of viewing on the subject of Holocaust revisionism to keep anyone who delights in truth (or as Prof. Faurisson prefers to put it, 'exactitude') over propaganda interested for days on end. The list that follows is but a small portion of that store, but may serve well as an introduction for those relatively new to the subject.
Off Your Knees, Germany! Ernst Zundel 1983 - 2003 (Full Video)
Robert Faurisson Documentary
Doug Christie YouTube Channel
Doug Christie: Thoughts on the Release of Ernst Zundel 2010
Doug Christie Free Speech is the Issue. Speech from Oct 16 1997 in Toronto
Short selected clips from the Douglas Christie Memorial Video Archive
David Cole: Jewish documentary maker exposes the fraud of Auschwitz
Bishop Richard Williamson on the Holocaust – 2008 (English Bishop Williamson, so far courageous and resolute, despite persecution from both within and without the Catholic church...)
The Truth about Holocaust by Jewish Professor Domergue
Sylvia Stolz "The Reality of Freedom of Expression" Full Speech, Uncut (English voice-over version. This link will take you to a page that includes a transcript of the subtitle version. Note that the video is also known as "Speech Ban - Prohibition of Proof - Defence Prohibition, Sylvia Stolz")
Sylvia Stolz 2013 "A Personal Reply" w. English Subtitles (This link will take you to a page that includes a transcript of the subtitles. Note that this video is also known as "Sylvia Stolz - Reply to Holocaust Denial accusations")
Ursula Haverbeck: The Panorama Interview, with English Subtitles Alternative link here. The first link is to the video, but requires login to archive.org to view. The second doesn't require login. The first, however, includes a well-written article introducing the video.
Ursula Haverbeck on The Greatest Problem of Our Time (with English Subtitles)
The Great Holocaust Trial 1985 (FULL VIDEO)
The Revisionists - men & women of heart and soul (Tribute clip)
Update January 2017: Hollywood Jewry in damage control
In what appears to be international Jewry's panic stations attempt to halt the increasing number of people waking up to the Holocaust fraud, Hollywood has come up with its latest insult to the collective intelligence: a film called 'Denial', allegedly about the Irving/Lipstadt Holocaust libel trial of early 2000, but unlikely to have even a passing resemblance to the reality of that unfortunate event, in which exceptional WW2 historian David Irving, entirely on his own and with his own funds, took on a huge legal team costing millions of dollars and funded by Jewish tycoons and organizations, among them Steven Spielberg and the American Jewish Committee.......
Read More
Update March 2017: More Jewish panic, bullying and hypocrisy as the public continues to unplug from the perception management machine........
Amazon bows to pressure from Jewish groups and media, banning hundreds of books by Holocaust revisionist scholars as sales begin to soar worldwide. Predictably, the mainstream media ignores the story.
When leading revisionist scholar, Germar Rudolf, was asked recently (in an interview with Kevin Barrett) why he thought Amazon had resorted to the digital equivalent of a mass "book-burning" this month, he summed it up simply in one word: "Success".
Speaking of his publishing company, Castle Hill, Rudolf explained:
“At the end of last year we had some 100 titles listed.....And soon we were observing sales statistics with some of these [revisionist] books that were similar to comparable books representing orthodoxy. Sometimes ours were selling better than those of the orthodoxy. And that development was prevalent since last summer and early fall. I was observing that we were catching up and overtaking the sales of the other side......Well, the Jewish lobby can read those statistics too. It is a matter of cultural hegemony. This topic is extremely crucial for their cultural hegemony: put a guilt trip on everyone because of the poor Jews being exterminated, and the threat of them being exterminated again. They can manipulate everyone, including their own people: Jews are being educated to be paranoid against non-Jews, to keep the sheep in the flock. So they use it for both sides. So these (sales statistics) showed there was a paradigm shift, a cultural threat, and if they let it happen it would strike at the very core of their hegemony. And so something was bound to happen......."
Read More
Other Recommended Reading
"None are so hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes." - Goethe
1. Are we the unwitting slaves of a hidden hand?
Click here for the article 'The Money Trap: Do I Need to be a Slave to Money? (Applying the Scientific Method to the question of Liberty.)'
2. Are your desires being used to control and enslave you?
Click here for the article 'The Sex Deception (A Young Man's Guide.)'
3. The Rosenhan experiment. The professor's trick that exposed the ongoing psychiatry fraud.....
It's 1972. Eight men and women and a psychology professor walk into various psychiatric hospitals in the US pretending to be hearing voices. Immediately institutionalized by all the hospitals bar none they then return to their normal behaviour. Will any of the psychiatrists or nurses on the hospital staff spot the deception? What happens next will shatter any illusions you may have about psychiatry forever..........
“The fact that the patients often recognized normality when staff did not raises important questions.”
"Any diagnostic process that lends itself too readily to massive errors of this sort cannot be a very reliable one."
- D.L.Rosenhan, psychologist
Psychiatrists: health professionals or thought policemen? You decide.......Click here for more.
Professor Finkelstein
“An antisemite used to be someone who hates Jews; nowadays an antisemite is someone Jews hate.”
- Gilad Atzmon, Jewish musician and author, 2011
"I think Israel, as a number of commentators pointed out, is becoming an insane state. And we have to be honest about that. While the rest of the world wants peace, Europe wants peace, the US wants peace, but this state wants war, war and war."
"[Israel] is a vandal state.....Israel is Genghis Khan with a computer."
"...sometimes I feel that Israel has come out of the boils of the hell, a satanic state."
- Professor Norman Finkelstein, Jewish-American political scientist and author, 2009
"Well the important point about a diary of a Foreign minister is that you shine light on areas of government that are otherwise in darkness and the influence of lobby groups is one of those areas.”
"I think party donations and a program of giving trips to MPs and journalists to Israel.....it needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level.”
“It’s an appalling situation if Australia allows a group of [Jewish] businessmen [in Melbourne] to veto policy on the Middle East.”*
- Bob Carr, interview with Sarah Ferguson (ABC), and *excerpt from 'The Diary of a Foreign Minister', 2014
Click here for the transcript of the Sarah Ferguson interview. Or here for the video.
Pictured: Two sides of politics, but both Bob Carr (left) and Malcolm Fraser (right) have publicly acknowledged the inappropriate and disproportionate power wielded by the Jewish community lobby in Australian politics.........
Consider the following excerpt from Zionist gatekeeper Jon Faine's interview with Malcolm Fraser in 2014:
Jon Faine (ABC): Bob Carr has managed to upset a lot of people here in Australia and overseas with his memoir, saying that he thought that the pro-Israel, in particular Jewish community lobby in Australia wielded too much power. What does Malcolm Fraser think of that?
Malcolm Fraser: They certainly do.....The Jewish community seeks to get Australia to support policies as defined by Israel.
- Malcolm Fraser, 'The Conversation Hour' (ABC), May 2014
Click here for an mp3 of the full interview (Note that the part referring to pro-Israel lobby influence starts at around the 45 minute mark.)
See also:
Israeli Deceptions Go South: Ex-Australian Prime Minister Confirms Israel Attacked America
Israel's Apologists: Anthony Lawson exposes the ABC's Zionist Gatekeeper Jon Faine
"I think party donations and a program of giving trips to MPs and journalists to Israel.....it needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level.”
“It’s an appalling situation if Australia allows a group of [Jewish] businessmen [in Melbourne] to veto policy on the Middle East.”*
- Bob Carr, interview with Sarah Ferguson (ABC), and *excerpt from 'The Diary of a Foreign Minister', 2014
Click here for the transcript of the Sarah Ferguson interview. Or here for the video.
Pictured: Two sides of politics, but both Bob Carr (left) and Malcolm Fraser (right) have publicly acknowledged the inappropriate and disproportionate power wielded by the Jewish community lobby in Australian politics.........
Consider the following excerpt from Zionist gatekeeper Jon Faine's interview with Malcolm Fraser in 2014:
Jon Faine (ABC): Bob Carr has managed to upset a lot of people here in Australia and overseas with his memoir, saying that he thought that the pro-Israel, in particular Jewish community lobby in Australia wielded too much power. What does Malcolm Fraser think of that?
Malcolm Fraser: They certainly do.....The Jewish community seeks to get Australia to support policies as defined by Israel.
- Malcolm Fraser, 'The Conversation Hour' (ABC), May 2014
Click here for an mp3 of the full interview (Note that the part referring to pro-Israel lobby influence starts at around the 45 minute mark.)
See also:
Israeli Deceptions Go South: Ex-Australian Prime Minister Confirms Israel Attacked America
Israel's Apologists: Anthony Lawson exposes the ABC's Zionist Gatekeeper Jon Faine